It’s a phrase I’m
hearing more and more often in these times of political crisis, economic
meltdown and social brouhaha. The way it’s used has, needless to say, a dry,
puritan, moralistic tone: hard-working = good, but what’s the opposite? Slacking?
Idling? Scrounging? Being – gasp – a claimant
(a composite of all three qualities)?
I worked once with a
copywriter who would dash off a piece of work with the words “that’ll do, fuck
’em”. He was usually right – his stuff would get approved without much of a
problem. Not that he cared: he was already down the pub. Whatever else it was, it
wasn’t hard work. But it was good enough.
I myself consider
that I work quite hard. I like doing things as well as I can. Do I therefore
consider myself to be “hard-working”? Well, no. I also like to sit and look. I
like nothing better than to potter aimlessly and I’m very, very good at it. On
occasion, I work quite hard at not doing anything in particular, with nothing
visible or tangible to show for it, but usually it comes pretty easily. I certainly
don’t qualify for the label of hard-working.
I remain puzzled: who
are the politicians referring to when they talk about hard-working people? We
talk about the “idle rich”, but I’ve never heard mention of the “idle poor”. In
between, there’s a vast number of people who would rather work enough to keep
life and soul together and have time to spend with family and friends – or
whatever – than spend their lives caught up in the relentless pursuit of
wealth, which I suspect is the real subtext of the phrase.
I have this probably
rather old-fashioned and quaint belief that “enough” is much better than “too
much”. I don’t think I’m alone in that. And I will work quite hard to acquire
enough, but no more to get too much: I don’t really want it. As a wealth creation
unit, I’m happy to admit I’m crap. And I make a rubbish capitalist. But I
fondly believe that my working life has been a richer one for not trying to make
my first million and it’s not over yet.
I tell you what. If I
win £101,000,000 on the Lottery, I’ll share it with you. I suppose that means I’d
better buy a ticket: there’s a first time for everything.
No comments:
Post a Comment